The Role of Women in Othello - 777 Words

A woman is the full circle but it is ordinarily believed that women are the weaker species. Women in this play conduct themselves in such a way that they allow men to dominate them. Back in the days women were taken as property. They were distrusted and mistreated. Men held more power than women. The disparity in the number of characters expresses the preferred gender in the play; there are more men than women. This bigotry is very much accentuated in the whole play. Women are spoken vicious of and often treated as furniture. They depict to be conquered yet the whole play is cantered on women. The play involves three women and they are all kept; Desdemona who is married to Othello, Emilia who is the wife of Iago and Bianca who is the mistress of Cassio. In the first act of the play, after Othello and Desdemona’s merger (marriage), Barbantio accuses him before the duke. . â€Å"O thou foul thief!†(act1.2. 62) â€Å"She is abus’d, stol’n from me†. (act1.3.60) He utters in such a way that he refers to Desdemona as his possession, she was stolen from him he claims. He calls Othello thief which articulate that he purloined Barbantio’s commodity. â€Å"A man he is of honesty and trust. To his conveyance I assign my wife†,(act1.3.281.282) Othello in this perspective handles Desdemona like a perishable good that needs to be conveyed and taken care of with delicacy.â€Å"†¦come here my dear love. The purchase made, the fruits are to ensue; that profit’s yet to come ’†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Othello refers to his marriageSho w MoreRelatedThe Role of Women in Othello645 Words   |  3 Pages There are only three female characters in William Shakespeares play Othello, Desdemona, Othello’s wife, Emilia, Iago’s wife and Desdemona’s lady-in-waiting, and Bianca, a courtesan. When first introduced to this limited number of representatives of the female gender, it is quickly assumed that they will not be very present or have an important role in story. In addition, the male characters of the play see women as submissive and promiscuous possessions that should be controlled by either theirRead MoreRoles Of Women In Othello1112 Words   |  5 PagesIn William Shakespeare’s tragic drama â€Å"Othello†, Shakespeare puts emphasis on the role of the female characters and their influence on the male protagonists. Othello’s love and jealousy regarding his wife made this play a tragedy. There are only three women in the play Othello; Desdemona, Emilia and Bianca. The way in which these women behave and present themselves strongly reflects the i deological expectations of women within Shakespeare’s imagined Venetian society as well as the Elizabethan societyRead MoreEssay on Role of Women in Othello1742 Words   |  7 PagesRole of Women in Othello  Ã‚        Ã‚  Ã‚   In William Shakespeare’s tragic drama Othello, the wife of the protagonist, Desdemona, is the main female character. Secondly, there is the ancient’s wife, Emilia, who is morally ambivalent. Thirdly, there is the girlfriend of Michael Cassio, Bianca, who makes her appearance later in the drama. This essay will analyze the roles of these three women.    At the outset of the play Iago persuades the rejected suitor of Desdemona, Roderigo, to accompany himRead MoreEssay On The Role Of Women In Othello1919 Words   |  8 Pages In William Shakespeare’s tragic drama Othello, Shakespeare puts emphasis on the role of the female characters and their influence on the male protagonists. Othello’s love and jealousy regarding his wife made this play a tragedy. There are only three women in the play Othello; Desdemona, Emilia, and Bianca. The way in which these women behave and present themselves strongly reflects the ideological expectations of women within Shakespeare’s imagined Venetian society as well as the Elizabethan societyRead More Role of Women in Shakespeare’s Othello Essay1036 Words   |  5 PagesRole of Women in Shakespeare’s Othello In Shakespeare’s Othello, the role of women is greatly emphasized. The important characters of the play, Othello, Iago, and Cassio, each have a women that stands behind him. These women each have an obligation to remain loyal and respect their husbands wishes, especially Desdemona and Emilia. We see Desdemona as a young beautiful white female, madly in love with a powerful black man. She is strong inside but doesnt tend to show that side of her asRead More The Role Of Women in Shakespeares Othello Essay1469 Words   |  6 Pages The Role Of Women in Othellonbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; nbsp; In Shakespeares Othello, as in most writings of his time, women are viewed as trophies or objects to capture the attention of men. I do not doubt that these men do love their wives, but the love, respect and admiration for their women is much different that of our time. It seems modern women are much more capable of having what could be known as an equal opportunity marriage. In the days of sacred virginityRead MoreShakespeare s Othello - Women s Roles2050 Words   |  9 PagesWomen in Othello In Shakespeare’s Othello women are depicted as possessions, ’whores’, and generally just submissive beings with only a few situational exceptions. They are simply sexual objects in the view of the men that dominate this play, but at times they break free of that label and show that women can be much more than that. In today’s society women are praised, they have value, and are worth much more than how they are depicted by Shakespeare. Each of the three women in the play haveRead MoreShakespeare s Othello - Role Of Women And Gender Representation1312 Words   |  6 PagesWomen in Othello The role of women and gender representation in Othello challenged the male dominated society in that time period. Women in Shakespeare’s time were seen as being loyal and submissive to their husbands and not going against their husband’s judgment. Shakespeare developed complex and varied female characters in his plays, especially the women portrayed in Othello. In the play, Shakespeare introduces three female characters: Desdemona, Othello s wife, Emilia, Iago’s wife and mistressRead MoreWomen ´s Role in Othello by William Shakespeare717 Words   |  3 PagesFrailty, thy Name is Woman Women stereotypically are portrayed as a weak gender. Often women are given the roles in which they must rely on the protection and permission of men to go about both action and idea. When conflict occurs between any male characters, the female character can be torn and forced to make a decision in which no matter the decision, she will be put in a bad view. When the demand for a woman to have allegiance to a man’s will and subsequently given no opinion or independentRead MoreThe Character Desdemona and the Role of Women Depicted in Shakespeares Othello822 Words   |  4 PagesThe society in which Othello takes place is a patriarchal one, where men had complete control over women. They were seen as possessions rather than being just as equally human and capable of duties performed by men. All women of the Elizabethan were to obey all men, fathers, brothers, husbands, etc. Which leads me to the most reliable and trustworthy character of Desdemona, whom goes through many trial s just to satisfy her love. Shakespeare brings the thought of Desdemona into the play by Barbantio

Pearl Harbor Cause And Effect Essay - 1440 Words

The Battle of Pearl Harbor Cause and Effects By Dawn Martin (4631058) American Public University System June 11, 2017 HIST102: American History since 1877 Thomas Pfundstein The Battle of Pearl Harbor Cause and Effects On Sunday morning, December 7, 1941, at 7:55 AM the Japanese Empire led a surprise attack on the US Naval base Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, that would leave millions of Americans in shock, and heartbroken. Before the attack, the United States kept a low profile on International affairs, and concentrated on the domestic affairs at hand. This tragic moment in American history forever remembered. It is a mournful day for the American people, although, for the Japanese Empire it was an honorable day, one they would call a†¦show more content†¦In 1940, the United States was extremely against this animosity and reacted with trade embargoes and monetary approvals. FDR had talked with the Dutch and the British to see if they would agree upon embargoes on Japan. Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not want a conflict in the pacific as the United States was not prepared for war. For instance, the oil embargo that was organized between the British, the Dutch, and the United States was about 90% o f Japan’s imported oil. [3] This upset Japan because without oil or fuel their military and war efforts would come to a complete stop. Beginning of the year in 1941, FDR decided that the Pacific Fleet would move to Hawaii from San Diego in the hopes of discouraging the invasion of the Japanese. Negotiations between Washington and Tokyo had been going on for several months without a resolution. On July 2, 1941, the Imperial High Command was tired of negotiations with the United States and needed to proceed with their development within Asia even with the embargo in place and meaning it would be at a high risk of war with the US. [4] Therefore, the Japanese had deceived the United States, ignored the arbitration, and moved forward with their plans. The United States had hoped that this restrictive embargo would halt Japan’s assault as negotiations had continued well into November. Instead of giving into the United States demands, the Japanese had decided to finally put their surpriseShow MoreRelatedPearl Harbor Cause And Effect Essay1396 Words   |  6 PagesThe Battle of Pearl Harbor Cause and Effects On Sunday morning, December 7, 1941, at 7:55 AM the Japanese Empire led a surprise attack on the US Naval base Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, that would leave millions of Americans in shock, and heartbroken. Before the attack, the United States kept a low profile on International affairs, and concentrated on the domestic affairs at hand. This tragic moment in American history forever remembered. It is a mournful day for the American people, although, for theRead MoreCritical Thinking : The Atomic Bomb1013 Words   |  5 PagesAngel Colbourne AMH-2020-02C 10/16/14 Critical Thinking Essay In this essay critical thinking skills will be used to answer questions about the atomic bomb. First, I will be discussing why the atomic bomb was developed. On December 21st, 1938, nuclear fission was discovered in Germany by Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann. It should be noted that this was nine months before World War II. Many physicists immediately saw that nuclear fission could be used to make extremely deadly bombs. The idea of usingRead MoreThe War And Its Effects On Society1357 Words   |  6 Pagesalong with havoc and despair. It impacts those that are involved in the war itself, along with the families of those involved. Society is also impacted by war, both economically and emotionally. War effects every person associated with it or around it. War even effects innocence people. Just as war effects everyone involved in it, so does the art, music, and literature associated with it. Since the beginning of time, art, music and literature have made large impacts on people in life and making an impactRead MoreThe Radar and World War II1626 Words   |  6 Pagesthe United States during the Pacific War? This investigation evaluates the development of naval radar technology during the WWII and how the improvements of the radar helped the US to succeed in the war. To see the change throughout the years, the essay will include the radar before the WWII. The time period will during 1900-1945. Radar was researched by the British in the 1930s as a means to track migratory birds using radio waves to bounce off objects back to a receiver. The length of time it takesRead MoreWorld War 2 : Argumentative Essay1088 Words   |  5 PagesWorld War 2 Argumentative Essay World War 2 was a massive war which engulfed the whole world from 1939 – 1935. There were 2 different sides in the war. These two sides were the Allies and the axis. At the start of the war, the Allies consisted of Great Britain and all of its colonies (such as Australia) and France. The Axis consisted of Germany, Italy, Japan and the Soviet Union. At the start of the war the axis powers were dominating. Germany used â€Å"Blitzkrieg† (Lighting war) tactics very successfullyRead MoreWhen is war justified715 Words   |  3 Pagesprotect one’s nation from harm. A well-known example is when America was attacked by Japan at Pearl Harbor. America responded to this attack by bombing Japan and putting an end to this engagement. If America had not responded in this way, then how many more casualties would they have suffered? America’s act of self-defense revealed to Japan that they don’t want to engage in a war with America and in effect caused Japan to re treat and make peace with America. Humanitarian wars are not justified becauseRead MoreWallace Stevens Poem The Death of a Soldier and William Faulkners Story Two Soldiers: A Comparative Analysis757 Words   |  3 PagesDeath of a Soldier and E.E. Cummings poem my sweet old etcetera in your textbook, Select Writers of the Twentieth Century. Select either poem and analyze the view of war in the poem with the view of war in Faulkners story Two Soldiers. The essay should be well- developed and well-supported with the texts. Wallace Stevens The Death of a Soldier honors the common, unremarkable death of an ordinary soldier. War is portrayed as inevitable in the Stevens poem, like the seasons. As in aRead MoreDifference Between Violence And Compassion1404 Words   |  6 Pagesafter seeing an act of compassion. In this essay You will learn the difference between violence and compassion and how violence has more of an impact on people than compassion. Some acts of compassion wouldn’t exist without violence . Take Clara Barton for example, if the civil war never happened, she never would have become a hero or started the red cross because she never would have become a nurse in the army and seen the physical and mental effects of war on the human body. Malala is anotherRead MoreFree Papers1007 Words   |  5 PagesIf you are looking for free academic papers such as free essays, free term papers, free research papers, free dissertations, free book reports/book reviews, free essays, free speeches, there exists a chance of being accused of plagiarism. Free papers downloaded from essay databases and essay sites can be easily detected by plagiarism detection systems and sofwares. You can find a lot of resources and sites with databases of free sample papers and free example papers on any topic. You can use theseRead MoreFree Papers992 Words   |  4 PagesIf you are looking for free academic papers such as free essays, fre e term papers, free research papers, free dissertations, free book reports/book reviews, free essays, free speeches, there exists a chance of being accused of plagiarism. Free papers downloaded from essay databases and essay sites can be easily detected by plagiarism detection systems and sofwares. You can find a lot of resources and sites with databases of free sample papers and free example papers on any topic. You can use these

Financial Accounting Standards Board free essay sample

Charging off equipment that cost less than $20 would be an example of the application of: a. |going concern| b. |cost| c. |matching| d. |materiality| e. |realization| ANS:D 2. The going concern assumption: a. |is applicable to all financial statements| b. |primarily involves periodic income measurement| c. |allows for the statements to be prepared under generally accepted accounting principles| d. |requires that accounting procedures be the same from period to period| e. |none of the answers are correct| Understating assets and revenues is justified based on: a. |realization assumption| b. |matching| c. |consistency| d. |realization| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:E 4. The assumption that enables us to prepare periodic statements between the time that a business commences operations and the time it goes out of business is: a. |time period| b. |business entity| c. |historical cost| d. |transaction| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:A 5. Valuing assets at their liquidation values is not consistent with: a. We will write a custom essay sample on Financial Accounting Standards Board or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page |conservatism| b. |materiality| c. |going concern| d. |time period| . |none of the answers are correct| ANS:C 6. The business being separate and distinct from the owners is an integral part of the: a. |time period assumption| b. |going concern assumption| c. |business entity assumption| d. |realization assumption| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:C 7. The principle that assumes the reader of the financial statements is not interested in the liquidation values is: a. |conservatism| b. |matching| c. |time period| d. |realization| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:E 8. An accounting period that ends when operations are at a low ebb is: a. a calendar year| b. |a fiscal year| c. |the natural business year| d. |an operating year| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:C 9. The accounting principle that assumes that inflation will not take place or will be immaterial is: a. |monetary unit| b. |historical cost| c. |realization| d. |going concern| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:A 10. Valuing inventory at the lower of cost or market is an application of the: a. |time period assumption| b. |realization principle| c. |going concern principle| d. |conservatism principle| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:D 11. The realization principle leads accountants to usually recognize revenue at: a. |the end of production| b. |during production| c. |the receipt of cash| d. |the point of sale| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:D 12. The comment that â€Å"items that are not material may be recorded in the financial statements in the most economical and expedient manner possible† is representative of: a. |matching| b. |conservatism| c. |realization| d. |materiality| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:D 13. The assumption that deals with when to recognize the costs that are associated with the revenue that is being recognized is: a. matching| b. |going concern| c. |consistency| d. |materiality| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:A 14. The most significant current source of generally accepted accounting principles is the: a. |New York Stock Exchange| b. |Accounting Principles Board| c. |Accounting Research Studies| d. |AICPA committee on Accounting Procedure| e. |Financial Accou nting Standards Board| ANS:E 15. All but one of the following statements indicates a difference between the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and prior approaches. Select the one that is not a difference. a. The FASB is independent of the AICPA. | b. | The size of the board is much smaller. | c. |The FASB has broader representation. | d. |The FASB is the primary board for the development of generally accepted accounting principles. | e. |Members of the FASB serve on a full-time basis. | ANS:D 16. The Accounting Principles Board issued Opinions between: a. |1959-1973| b. |1939-1959| c. |1973-present| d. |1966-1976| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:A 17. The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued statements between: a. |1960-1973| b. |1939-1959| c. |1973-present| d. 1966-1976| e. |none of the answers are correct| ANS:C 18. Accountants face a problem of when to recognize revenue. Which of the following methods of recognizing revenue is not used in practice? a. |point of sale| b. |point of order acceptance| c. |end of production| d. |receipt of cash| e. |revenue recognized during production| ANS:B 19. The organization that has by federal law the responsibility to adopt auditing standards is the: a. |New York Stock Exchange| b. |Public Company Accounting Oversight Board| c. |Accounting Principles Board| d. |Financial Accounting Standards Board| . |AICPA Committee on Accounting Procedure| ANS:B 20. By law, the setting of accounting standards is the responsibility of the: a. |AICPA Committee on Accounting Procedure| b. |New York Stock Exchange| c. |Accounting Principles Board| d. |Securities and Exchange Commission| e. |Financial Accounting Standards Board| ANS:D 21. The assumption that allows accountants to accept some inaccuracy, because of incomplete information about the future, in exchange for more timely reporting is: a. |conservatism| b. |time period| c. |business entity| d. |materiality| e. |realization| ANS:B 22.

The Kenya Shifta War and Realism free essay sample

In this essay I am going to discuss the Kenyan war that has emerged in 1963 due to long-lasting grievances about bad treatment from British colonial isolation and ethnic Somali in Kenya irredentism drive to unite all other five Somali lands with Kenya into a greater Somalia. The issue of British colony had otherwise been much less to do with this war, the main reason to war was that of irredentism by Somalis. This conflict went on as Somalis resisted from being governed by a dark skinned government of the Prime Minister Jomo Kenyatta while at the same time seek unity. Somali seek independence at the expense of Kenya. Somalia wanted to be in power to rule a unified greater Somalia but Kenya couldn’t let their borders be destroyed due to ethnic driven irredentism by Somalis. The Somali independence threatened the national and political unity in Kenya. Thereafter the effects or results of these differing goals led to the Shifta war of 1963. We will write a custom essay sample on The Kenya Shifta War and Realism or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The main point of which I intend to further emphasize in this essay is the interlink of the Realism operating system that existed in the beginning to the end of this war. I will further in this essay outline how power and force was used to reach the ends of this war. The main point of this essay shows the understanding of realism aspects that are interlinked with this war or conflict. I shall further in this essay argue on how the theory of Realism and power pursuit by Somalis led to the outburst of this war called Shifta and how it brought about end to this conflict. At the heart of this war there is a high power drive or fight for power by both Kenya and Somalia and both states were highly motivated to use force of aggression to be the most powerful state. Somalis in Kenya had an idea of breaking the borders of Kenya and merge it with the other five states of Somalia to form a greater Somalia. This was based on the idea of the common ethnicity by Somalis as they were Muslims by religion and shared common language. The possibility of this idea to come to reality was never assured since the British colonialism in Kenya has separated different kinds of ethnic groups to avoid disputes that arise due to ethnicity, religion or any culture and it has been the effective system to control Kenyan state since the state of Kenya had more than eighty-seven ethnic groups at that time. So the idea of Somalia of grouping or break Kenyan borders to form a great Somalia was not to be effective because Muslims by their religion are not like Christians who can exist within other religions and be able to be Christians without affecting or be affected by other religions or cultures. Muslims do not associate themselves with other kinds of cultures or religions, they are sort of discriminatory towards other clans. As this drive of irredentism by Somalia has been proven not to be effective by Kenyans, Kenyans had to lookout for their beliefs and its political system as well. The only way Kenya protected itself from this Somalia legacy, it had to fight for its dependency as well. Kenya therefore declined Somalis proposal as this Somalia system threatened Kenya’s political and national unity. As Kenyans declined Somalis proposal the views of both states clashed and this clash led to the adaptation of realism instruments to resolve conflict and that is to inflict force of aggression to each other to maintain or gain power. This act of inflicting force or aggression to one another is the pillar or it is at the centre of the realist states. And the good way of inflicting force or aggression to one another is to gain something out of it. The only thing the realists seek to gain at any act is power. Somalia was the first to challenge Kenya to war with the main pursuit of power to rule the entire Kenya state. Kenya had to fight back the Somalis to maintain their power. As Kenya fought for its independence from Somalia they had to use force to deter Somalis from taking what’s rightfully theirs which is their land and closed borders. Somalis it seemed they couldn’t find or think of any better way they could have used to try and settle its proposed deal to Kenya. Going to war was the better option they thought of, this is because they are Muslims by religion and they thought going to war with Kenya was just. Now that’s the realists’ way of dealing with uncertainty. In my opinion, Realism was the ruling political system that existed in this conflict. Great Britain as the father of Kenya due to colonization had to intervene to try and bring about an end to this war between Kenya and Somalia. The question is, how was it going to do that? The answer to that question is otherwise simple. It starts with the reason why would Great Britain colonise Kenya, and that is because Kenya has an abundance of raw materials that Britain was exploiting. Somalia with their non-profit making legacy of irredentism was to be a bad effects to how Britain rules Kenya. Britain had to protect its source of profit by helping Kenya defeat Somalia. Britain then supplied Kenya with arms to fight back Somalia so that the war will come to an early end so that Britain will  continue with the exploitation of raw materials from Kenya. So literally speaking, Somalia was just an itch that Britain had to scratch off. Britain even took some of Kenyans and trained them for war so that they will fight Somalis effectively and strategically to lead to an early end of war. This act by Britain is influenced by the system of realism as it wasn’t interested in understanding the war causes it just used its power to get control of its interests. It only had to make sure that it’s still have access to Kenyan’s raw materials. If it let Somalis win, it was going to be hard for them to regain full access to Kenya if it changes to great Somalia as most of the Somalis were Muslims and believe in just war and they believed fighting for independence from colonialism was just. So as negotiation couldn’t go any further or any better, Britain motivated acts of realism in this war so that its economy doesn’t get too much affected. It is the belief of realists that negotiations take long to reach a favourable conclusion and leads to more damage as negotiations are underway. We see this very clearly in this Shifta war. Both states were not so much interested to talk but to forcedly and aggressively claim and take what they wanted (act by Somalia) and forcedly or aggressively protect or secure what they thought was rightfully theirs (act by Kenya). Somalis went to war first with Kenya because by nature they are known of being homogenous, Muslim by religion with a warrior culture of proven ability and history of martial prowess unlike Kenya. Kenya was not too much of a big deal to Somalia. Somalis knew they will win the war and some of Kenyans knew this as well, but then since them all or both are realists Kenya just had to go to war just to utilise its power no matter how big or small. That is why then the Great Britain had to intervene by supplying Kenya with fire arms even with flying squad and train Kenyans on how to fight Somalis because it knew that Kenya had no ability to win the war against Somalis. Reasonably Britain doesn’t really care about Kenya as you might think, what it cares about are the raw materials it has exploited from Kenya that it stood to lose if Somalia win the war. As much power Somalis had, they were ready to utilize it as they attacked polling and police stations of Kenya and the rest. It is the idea of realists that states should seek power and a state having power must show the potential to use it towards other stated and that’s exactly what Somalis did and according to their realism system of dealing with grievances they had the potential of winning the war, sadly Britain couldn’t let that happen. Now as I have tried to make a clear understanding of realism that penetrates within this war through the proliferation of fire arms between states and no interest in negotiations I shall now outline how the power existed within this war. Within this conflict power exists the most as at the centre of realism, power is all that matters and realism is just all about power. Power is what defines the operating system of Realism and its readiness to be utilized whenever necessary was a command. (Off the topic; if for example Samsung Galaxy SIII was Realism, Android would be its power of operation). However, power in this conflict seems to have conditions. For example, if Somalia had this conflict with Ethiopia, the Great Britain was not going to intervene, why? Because it has no interest in doing so and there is nothing to gain in either loss or win of either states. Back to Kenyan Shifta war, Britain was more than interested to exert its power to assist Kenya in winning the Shifta war. This power that bares here is because Britain have wealth to take care of from Kenya and when Kenya wins the war, Britain still have full access to Kenyans raw materials. However, Somalis were ready to finish or win the war as they have started it. But Kenya became more powerful as Britain assisted them. Somali strength was dramatically decreasing as Kenya used high technological weapons that Somalis can’t afford. Also, Kenya even killed their cattles and camels that belonged to Somalis so the war became mean and strong for Somalis. All of a sudden Kenya was now the ruler in this war and it was indeed in a power trip. If I further explain the power trip that Kenya was recently enjoying towards to the end of Shifta war, the power that Kenya really had was the economic power that had a lot to do with the involvement of Britain so Britain had to support Kenya to defeat Somalis. Without raw materials that Kenya had, there would be no economic power it had hence British wasn’t going to support Kenya to win the war. So power within this conflict had conditions and without those conditions, Kenya was left powerless. Power that Kenya had then became the major solution to bring about this war to an end and the lack of or otherwise lessor power Somalis had was good news for Britain. Something else was going on in the emergence of Shifta war. Let alone Shifta war being caused mostly by the issue of irredentism, the other cause was that of bad treatments by British government to Kenya and Kenyan Somalis. For as much as Kenyan Somalis seek independence and wanted to unite Kenya with other five Somali lands, Somalia didn’t want anything to do with the British colony because of its aggression and stealing of wealth Somalis believed it was rightfully theirs. British colony was the other cause of this war. To prove how powerful Britain had been to this war, just think how it used Kenya to defeat Somalia. In my understanding the Shifta war was not between Kenya and Somalia but it was between the Great Britain and Somalia. Kenya was used as a means to the ends of Britain. Now this proves how powerful Britain is and its readiness to use its power, as it seek to win Kenya it used Kenya to get rid of Somalia and that was the end of war and more resource exploitation by Britain in Kenya whilst even Kenya didn’t feel good under British colony. Kenya had nothing or very less to do to challenge the British to war as powerful Britain is and its use of realism instruments to deter conflict. For as many interests Somalia had starting from religious, independence and ethnicity or clan grouping to name a few, if anyone threatens those interests, Somalis were ready to defend them, even if protecting those interests had a potential to lead to warfare Somalis were ready to take that risk. That is why it was pleasurable for Britain to intervene because they knew that with Somalia government in power things were going to change to worst for Britain in its raw materials exploitation. The fight of Somalia was the fight of power other than unity. Somali fought for more than just land, they fought for the clans’ right, freedom from British colony and power. It seeked power to rule all Somalia spheres and add Kenya to become a great Somalia. As they seek to increase their power they were prepared to fight for it aggressively and that’s what realists do. Towards the resolution of the Shifta war. The solution was just that of realism perspective, â€Å"Power†. If it wasn’t for the power that Britain had landed to Kenya, war wasn’t going to end anytime sooner because Somalia was still facing the great fight of the Great Britain. What would have made it worse is that it was going take long as Somalis fail to accept failure. So Britain realized this and thought strategically by using Kenya to put an end to this war. Despite Kenyan government offer for economic assistance to Somalia to improve pastures and install new water resources like boreholes, Somalis regarded these tenders as less desirable that the unity with Kenya. Despite Kenya becoming more powerful, Somalia just had a lot of losses due to war, cattles, population, running out attacking equipment, loss of outside support by other countries, clans turning against each other and the war just became meaningless. That was the power drainage by Kenya to Somalia. It was rather pointless fighting with Somalia anymore. Power that Kenya had brought about an end to this Shifta war. This proves the existence of realism operating system at the centre of the Shifta war. Shifta war showed so much aspects to understand realism and power on how it really works. Shifta war as started aggressively by inflicting force to one another, it had otherwise ended with war when Kenya became more powerful than Somalia hence realism ends gained. The Shifta war again showed us the conditions of power that penetrated between Kenya, Somalia and Britain as Britain chose to favour Kenya than Somalia to win the war. At the end Kenya remained Kenya and Somalia remained as Somalia. Going to war was absolutely a waste of resources for Somali.